| Page 56 | CALAS

Volume: Land Use

The dual myths of virgin land to conquer and El Dorado to exploit have been the central images in the imaginary of land usage in Latin American. These metaphors are essential to the understanding of the genealogy of the Anthropocene in the region from the Conquista up to today. We start with the idea that homo sapiens have always altered their habitats.

English

Volume: Mining and Energy

Since the colonial conquests, societal relationships with nature in many parts of the Americas have been dominated by the extraction of metals and mineral resources. – especially gold, silver, zinc, copper, coal, and oil. The history of the entire continent has been shaped by the flows of extractivism and by making available and extracting (first) human, biomass and (later) fossil energy that enabled and intensified these flows (Topik 2006; Bakewell 1971).

English

Volume: Water

Within the theme of the Anthropocene as multiple crisis, we structure this volume about water around problems that each can encapsulate certain periods of time. Two beliefs brought us to propose this structure. First, both between the ones who first minted the term and the Latin American investigators that use it, it is mutually understood that the Anthropocene began at the end of the 18th century with the creation of the steam engine (i.e.

English

Handbooks

The aim of this 6-volume handbook-project “The Anthropocene as a Multiple Crisis. Perspectives from Latin America” that is edited by the Maria Sibylla Merian Center for Advanced Latin American Studies (CALAS) is to systematize the multifaceted environmental crises which reached and passed the planetary boundaries of the earth-systems and led to the new geological time of the Anthropocene from Latin American and social sciences and humanities standpoints.

English

International Conference "At the Cutting Edges of Knowledge Production: Borders and Black Holes in Academic Dialogue"

The dialogical exchange between researchers on an equal footing is a basic normative principle of the academic field. Differentiations within the field result from academic recognition and merits. As democratic as this ideal may sound, the academic landscape is also permeated by multiple, intersectional inequalities, discrimination, and exclusionary mechanisms. There is often still a gulf that is rooted in a historically developed colonial geopolitics of knowledge particularly between the Global North and the Global South.

Undefined